MOB FELLOWS
Modern Operators in the Boardroom

Twelve weeks, five disciplines.

Every session answers a single question: what must a director know, ask, or decide? The curriculum assumes technical mastery and builds governance upon it.

Weeks 1–3
The Fiduciary
Foundation

Duties, liability, and the board–management line.

The duties of care and loyalty, and where director liability actually arises under Caremark and its successors. The line between oversight and management, taught through governance failures on both sides of it. Committee structures, the board calendar, and executive sessions. How to read a board book, worked on a real one.

The central skill of the module is the conversion of an operator's instinct, here is how I would fix it, into a director's question: what would have to be true for management's plan to fail?

Weeks 4–6
Finance and
the Audit Committee

Financial fluency, which is where most technical candidacies founder.

Directors are expected to read and question financial statements without assistance. For most technical leaders this is the widest distance between the skill they hold and the skill a nominating committee assumes they hold.

The module covers the 10-K as an oversight instrument, MD&A read against the strategy management presented, non-GAAP adjustments and what they reveal about incentives, internal control over financial reporting and what a material weakness means for a director personally, the audit committee's relationship with its external auditor, and the patterns that commonly precede restatements.

Weeks 7–9
AI and Cyber
Oversight

Overseeing the function one used to run.

Fellows arrive as the most knowledgeable person in the room on this material, and the module asks them to set that posture aside. A board seat requires overseeing a former function rather than operating it, and most fellows find this harder than overseeing a domain they never mastered.

Cyber
The SEC disclosure regime as a director experiences it, including the materiality determination under a running clock and what a four-business-day window does to board process. Third-party and concentration risk. The interaction of cyber insurance and D&O coverage. NIST CSF rendered as a dashboard a non-technical director can act on.
AI
Model and deployment risk overseen without auditing models. AI incidents and the emerging disclosure logic. Exposure mapping across the EU AI Act and the US regulatory patchwork. The distinction between AI in the strategy and AI as a threat surface, which boards frequently conflate. Data governance as a board matter.
Weeks 10–11
Positioning and
the Board Search

How board searches are actually run.

Who sees a specification first, how long lists become short lists, and where candidates are quietly eliminated. Positioning as an enterprise leader who holds a domain specialty, rather than as a technologist for hire. The board biography and the one-page profile. Interviewing as a candidate director rather than as an executive. And the assessment of an opportunity: D&O terms, litigation and restatement history, controlling-shareholder dynamics, and the culture of the board itself.

Week 12
San Francisco

Simulations, the graded assessment, and a twelve-month candidacy plan.

The three days in San Francisco close Board Preparation and open the Search Year. Fellows leave with a complete board profile and a candidacy calendar reviewed by search firm faculty.

The Rubric

Five dimensions, assessed by the panel.

Judgment
Recognizing which decisions belong to the board and which belong to management.
Altitude
Framing questions rather than proposing solutions.
Fluency
Locating the financial figure that matters and probing it.
Translation
Rendering AI and cyber risk in terms of materiality, strategy, and capital.
Presence
The economy, timing, and effect of each intervention.

Each dimension is scored from one to five. The rubric is published to fellows at the start of Board Preparation, and fellows who need a second attempt take it at the following cohort's assessment window.